Have you seen or heard of something and said, that is to good to be true, but as time goes by and you keep thinking about it. Well this is my story about one of the attempts in my life to prove something, not to the world, just me.
The mythbusters have made a good living on disproving a lot of the hoaxes from YouTube Quacks. It just disappoints me, and I do not consider it entertaining to waste my time watching someone building a $20 hover board out of duck tape and magnets.
First if you have not heard about Paul Pantone’s invention, let me give some info on what “Geet” is. In short it is a way to reduce or eliminate pollution of the burning of fuel in a internal combustion engine and improve overall efficiency by heating the fuel to a plasma state in a simple tube reactor by using a bar magnet.
That the good news now for the bad. The red flags are… the inverter claims conspiracy around him being put in a mental hospital that keeps the invention from being produced and used in the commercial market. The unit has strange magnetic properties when in use the plans say. Inside the metal tubes a unique plasma effect is created and if you do not build it just right and orient the tube to magnetic north correctly it will not work. All of the parts can be bought from the local hardware store. Hummm.
Why waste the time and money?
People with no financial gain are building units and getting them to work. Universities, with real testing equipment, are reporting that they are getting similar results as stated in the plans. The inventor, now let out of the hospital in 2009, has announced that anyone is free to build their own unit for testing, one per household, and it be no copyright violation. And a new set of proof of concept plan from him on the auto engine size version was also available free to download.
So I made my commitment and started buying the parts to make the small version of the Geet Fuel Processor. The plans are laid out in segments and I found most of all the parts at ether Home Depot, Lowes or Ace Hardware. I did have to modify the layout to work on the particular lawn mower, I got for free, as my test motor. I substituted parts as I thought would work better or I found available.
Just as a warning, as the plans states, it is dangerous to work with gasoline in a vaporous form, being there is a risk of explosion or fire.
I kept a total of parts costs and so far I am up to $120.00
A good scientist would have calculated a benchmark of data but the mower was not running at the time I got it. And I do not have access to testing to read pollutants, I just want to see if it runs. If you read my older post on the subject of Gas fumes and lawn mowers they are out of control when it comes to pollution, so anything would be an improvement.
So I might not be able to say “BUSTED”, “PLAUSIBLE” or “CONFIRMED” across this project but hope to understand a little better about building, reading plans, discovery of new ideals and research of inventions. Have I been gullible and wasted all of this or answered my own questions? We’ll see.
This is just the beginning of this project for me and I have more work ahead. I will be posting my journey, and that is the most important thing. The Road not The Destination.
Posted By: Ron G.


One of my favorite things about blogging is this community of bloggers. We aren’t cut-throat. We share successes and miseries. And when something works, we don’t keep it to ourselves – we want it to work for everyone. I love blogging and hope that it becomes full-time one day, but I enjoy the learning and growing (the journey) and am a very patient man.
Scientists, you know those really educated people you hate, say this can stop the major damage. We’re already passed the point of minor damage according to most. Oh and carbon neutral doesn’t mean what it sounds. You can still be reducing. I know you’ll just thumb this down even though I’ve answered your actual question because you’re not looking for answers, just more science hating cons to scream its a hoax
I’m a homeowner and our average monthly bill is around $125 give or take $25. I’d love to install a wind turbine if it would work efficiently and cut our costs. I have no clue and would like to avoid days of research and defer to a professional if it is viable cost wise to try this project. I know there may be green grants or special financing available but again have no clue about total costs, pay back venues such as years to return investment and options for even more then one turbine. We are in a bit of a forced wind tunnel because of wall and home placement so we have abundant resources. Any heads up information would be very helpful.
i’m currently working on a project that generates dc power and runs under it’s own power. the end product will be inverted dc to ac power thus making “usable” electricity. i am only an amature/tinkerer and have come to find i don’t know as much as i’d like to in this area. My question is that if you were to use a voltage stablizer, would the electricity i’m producing be suitable for high end electronics? i understand that there are different sine waves and patterns in which electricity is conducted…(i basically need to make sure the squares will fit in the round holes?) lol
Would have been more exciting to hear a teaser clip of the engine than this picture.